What workflow would this feature improve for you?
Prioritize Feature Requests
Interviewer agent · 2.5K uses
Find the friction before your users churn over it. Moderated usability tests are gold, but you can only run so many. This template runs a structured conversation with each user — probing how they work today, where they get stuck, and what feels intuitive — so you gather usability reactions at scale and know what to fix.
Start from this conversation and adapt it to your team — change any question, add your own logic, and connect the tools you already use.
The core fields every response captures.
Where did you get confused or stuck, and why?
What one or two changes would make this meaningfully easier?
Follow-ups that change based on what people say.
If they get stuck, probe what they expected to happen instead
If something feels intuitive, ask what made it click
Different paths for different answers.
Route recurring friction points to the design and product teams
Direct intuitive moments into what to preserve in the next iteration
Actions that fire the moment a response comes in.
Send top friction points and quotes to the product team in Slack
Log each session's findings to a UX research doc in Notion
Post completed transcripts to your analysis pipeline via webhook
Point the template at the flow, feature, or interface you want feedback on. The AI moderator first explores how each user does the task today, then walks through their impressions, probing where they get stuck and why, what feels intuitive, and what they'd change — adapting follow-ups to each answer. Friction points and improvement ideas are synthesized across everyone.
Point the template at the flow, feature, or interface to test
Add a link or walkthrough of the experience
Set the dimensions to probe — current behavior, friction, intuitiveness
Review synthesized friction points and improvement ideas
A UX focus group gathers users' reactions to a product's usability and experience — how they currently accomplish a task, their impressions of an interface or flow, where they get confused or stuck, and what feels intuitive versus frustrating. Traditional usability sessions are run one at a time with a researcher, which limits how many you can do. This template runs the same structured, probing conversation with each user, adapting follow-ups to every answer, so you gather usability feedback from many users in parallel and get synthesized friction themes in hours. It complements moderated usability tests by scaling the qualitative reactions that surround them.
More research templates to test usability, concepts, and the product experience.
What workflow would this feature improve for you?
Interviewer agent · 2.5K uses
If you could only have one of these improvements, which would it be?
Interviewer agent · 2.1K uses
What's the one thing you'd change about the product?
Interviewer agent · 2.8K uses
Walk me through what you were doing right before you started using us.
Interviewer agent · 820 uses
Can you show me how you currently solve this problem?
Interviewer agent · 1.8K uses
Walk me through what happened when you tried to complete that task.
Interviewer agent · 1.6K uses
Go deeper on running AI focus groups for UX and usability research.

The complete guide to running AI focus groups — why they work, when to use them, and how to get started.
Read article
Concrete use cases for AI focus groups across product, CX, and design teams.
Read articleReplace drop-off, poor qualification, and missing context with AI conversations that capture structured data and real understanding. Set up in minutes.
No credit card required • Cancel anytime