You gave us a 7 — what would it take to make that a 10?
Uncover NPS Insights
Evaluator agent · 1.8K uses
CES surveys give you scores, not solutions. Traditional CES surveys only capture scores without context. This conversational template digs deeper when users report high effort, identifying specific UI issues, workflow bottlenecks, or feature gaps that impact your product experience.
Start from this conversation and adapt it to your team — change any question, add your own logic, and connect the tools you already use.
The core fields every response captures.
On a scale of 1-7, how easy was it to complete your task today?
What specific task were you trying to accomplish?
Follow-ups that change based on what people say.
If CES score is 6-7, ask about specific steps that felt difficult
If user mentions mobile experience, ask about device and browser type
Different paths for different answers.
Route high effort scores (5-7) to product team for feature feedback
Route bug reports to technical support with priority tagging
Actions that fire the moment a response comes in.
Create Jira tickets for reported UI/UX issues with effort context
Update customer health scores in ChurnZero based on CES responses
Send follow-up sequences in Intercom for users reporting high effort
Users rate their effort level, then the AI asks targeted follow-ups based on their score. High effort responses trigger questions about specific pain points, while positive scores explore what worked well for future optimization.
Define your CES scale and effort measurement criteria
Set up conditional flows for different effort score ranges
Configure follow-up questions for friction point identification
Connect responses to your product analytics and support tools
Static forms force complex situations into rigid dropdowns. Perspective captures structured data and the reasoning behind it — so your team makes better decisions, faster.
No context. No follow-up. No next step.
"Tell me more about the timeline — when did this start, and is there a deadline your team is working against?"
Extracted & structured automatically
Category
High-priority
Urgency
Deadline: 2 weeks
Sentiment
Frustrated but hopeful
Next step
Route to senior team
Right team. Full context. Instant action.
Effective CES surveys measure friction immediately after specific interactions when details are fresh in customers' minds. The key is moving beyond basic effort ratings to understand root causes of difficulty. Traditional CES forms ask customers to rate effort on a 1-7 scale but miss the context needed for improvements. The most valuable CES data comes from follow-up questions that explore which specific steps caused problems and how processes could be easier. Timing matters significantly - deploy CES conversations within hours of the interaction being measured.
Explore other customer feedback templates for measuring satisfaction and loyalty.
You gave us a 7 — what would it take to make that a 10?
Evaluator agent · 1.8K uses
What specifically made that experience frustrating for you?
Evaluator agent · 2.2K uses
What could we have done differently?
Evaluator agent · 1.5K uses
Did the support agent resolve your issue?
Evaluator agent · 1.7K uses
How was the buying experience from start to finish?
Evaluator agent · 1.4K uses
If you were our CEO for a day, what would you change first?
Evaluator agent · 2.4K uses
Learn advanced strategies for reducing customer effort and measuring experience quality.

Learn how to analyze customer effort scores and feedback instantly to reduce friction in real-time.
Read article
Master comprehensive voice of customer strategies that include CES surveys and effort-reduction initiatives.
Read article
Discover why conversational CES surveys outperform traditional customer effort score forms.
Read articleReplace drop-off, poor qualification, and missing context with AI conversations that capture structured data and real understanding. Set up in minutes.
No credit card required • Cancel anytime