Product Managers' AI-Driven Identity Crisis
How Product Managers Are Redefining Their Role in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
A comprehensive study of 54 product managers across North America and Europe reveals how AI is fundamentally reshaping the profession—not through replacement, but through radical redefinition.
Executive Summary
Product management is experiencing its most significant transformation since the role's inception. Our research with 54 product managers reveals that AI isn't simply changing the tools PMs use—it's forcing a complete reimagining of what it means to be a product manager.
The story emerging from our interviews is one of professional evolution under pressure. AI has liberated PMs from tactical drudgery, pushing them toward strategic work while simultaneously threatening to automate their core functions. In response, PMs are rallying around distinctly human capabilities: contextual judgment, stakeholder empathy, and what they call "taste"—the ineffable quality that separates good products from great ones.
This transformation reveals three critical insights: First, AI is elevating the PM role but also raising the stakes for demonstrating unique value. Second, when AI recommendations conflict with human intuition, experienced PMs consistently trust their contextual knowledge over algorithmic suggestions. Third, the future belongs to PMs who can orchestrate AI tools while maintaining irreplaceable human insight.
The implications extend far beyond product management. This research offers a preview of how knowledge work will evolve in the AI era—not through wholesale replacement, but through strategic repositioning around uniquely human capabilities.
Key Findings at a Glance
- "I honestly don't know what my job is then" - A Microsoft PM's response when asked about her role in 2027
- 67% admit to anxiety about AI replacing core aspects of their job, even as they embrace the technology
- "What value do you even bring anymore?" - The most uncomfortable question PMs fear being asked
- PM workforce reductions are already happening while engineering teams remain stable
- 100% report AI conflicts with their intuition, but human judgment wins every time
- "Taste" emerges as the final frontier - 85% believe aesthetic judgment cannot be automated
- The empathy defense - PMs are doubling down on relationships as their professional moat
How We Conducted This Research
Between June 10-13, 2025, we conducted in-depth interviews with 54 product managers across North America and Europe. Participants were recruited through professional networks, research panels, and industry connections, ensuring representation across company sizes, experience levels, and industries.
Each interview lasted 30-45 minutes and followed a structured format covering role evolution, specific AI usage patterns, decision-making processes, team dynamics, and future outlook. All participants received an incentive and provided business contact information for verification.
Who We Talked To
Our participant pool represents the core of the product management profession: experienced practitioners working at technology companies where AI adoption is most advanced.
Years of Product Management Experience
Distribution of product management experience among study participants
Experience LevelNumber of Participants
The majority of our participants (41%) had 6-10 years of experience—the sweet spot where PMs have developed strong intuition but remain adaptable to technological change. This cohort is experiencing the most dramatic role transformation, having established their careers in pre-AI product management but now navigating its fundamental disruption.
Company Size Distribution
Distribution of participants by company size
Company SizeNumber of Participants
We intentionally skewed toward larger organizations (44% at companies with 1,000+ employees) where AI adoption is most mature and its impact on PM roles most pronounced. However, we also included representation from startups and mid-size companies to capture the full spectrum of AI's impact across different organizational contexts.
Seniority Level Distribution
Distribution of participants by seniority level
Seniority LevelNumber of Participants
Our sample concentrated on individual contributor PMs (44%) and senior PMs (24%), reflecting the population most directly impacted by AI's tactical automation. We also included leadership perspectives from VPs and Directors to understand how AI is changing expectations from above.
Our sample concentrated on individual contributor PMs (44%) and senior PMs (24%), reflecting the population most directly impacted by AI's tactical automation. We also included leadership perspectives from VPs and Directors to understand how AI is changing expectations from above.
Industry Representation
Participants spanned diverse sectors: B2B SaaS (35%), Enterprise Software (22%), Consumer Technology (15%), Healthcare/Medical Devices (13%), Financial Services (9%), and Other (6%). This distribution reflects AI's broad impact across product management regardless of industry vertical.
Notable companies represented include Adobe, Microsoft, DocuSign, LinkedIn, Toast, Veeva Systems, Kroger, and Insulet, among others—organizations at the forefront of AI adoption where transformation pressures are most acute.
The Great Liberation: How AI Freed PMs from Their Tactical Prison
The most striking finding from our research is that AI has fundamentally altered what product managers spend their time doing. But this isn't just about efficiency gains—it's about professional liberation from work that many PMs never wanted to do in the first place.
The End of the Tactical Trap
For years, product managers have been caught in what we call the "tactical trap"—spending enormous amounts of time on administrative work, basic data analysis, and project coordination that felt necessary but not particularly valuable. AI has blown this paradigm apart, forcing PMs to confront what their role actually is when stripped of its operational busy work.
The transformation is happening at breakneck speed. Miranda Leschke at Microsoft described a change so dramatic that her title shifted from "technical program manager" to "product manager" as her focus moved from execution to vision.
"I used to spend a lot more time [...] tracking deliverables and tasks and gathering updates from engineering. Now, with more automation and AI, I'm asked to write more specs and future planning instead."
The Strategic Elevation Imperative
This liberation creates what we're calling the "strategic elevation imperative"—PMs are being pushed up the value chain whether they're ready or not. William Murri at Kroger captured this pressure:
"I work now on a much more strategic level, engaging with our senior leaders... what I really need to demonstrate is an understanding that encompasses much more than just a more isolated product space."
A Product Manager at DocuSign explained how this shift manifests in daily work:
"I spend less time writing data analytics queries or user research docs, often having these summarized by AI for me or created by AI. I spend a lot more time today analyzing the industry, market trends, and new technology being released."
The Dark Side of Liberation
But here's the uncomfortable truth: this elevation comes with a dark side. As Miranda noted, "PM workforce has been reduced while engineering hasn't as much as well."
The same AI that's liberating PMs from tactical work is also making it clear that fewer PMs can accomplish what previously required larger teams.
The message is clear: evolve or become redundant. PMs who can't make the leap from tactical execution to strategic thinking are finding themselves squeezed out of organizations that no longer need human project coordinators.
The New Division of Labor: AI Does, Humans Decide
What emerges from our research is a surprisingly consistent pattern in how PMs are dividing work with AI. It's not random or chaotic—there's a clear logic to what PMs delegate to AI versus what they jealously guard as human territory.
AI as the Ultimate Research Assistant
AI has become the ultimate research assistant, capable of processing vast amounts of information and generating initial analysis at superhuman speed. Sofia Martin at Insulet described how she uses AI:
"I use AI to perform rapid research on regulatory requirements and cultural and social differences in the different markets we were trying to enter, [this enables me] to build a baseline set of requirements within a span of days and weeks that would have previously taken months."
A Senior Product Manager at Jellyfish provided another example:
"I uploaded a CSV to an AI tool, explained the structure of the data, and was able to have a conversation around several different hypothesis relative to this persona. In the process, the AI tool generated several useful data tables, which we used to conclude we weren't missing any critical features for this persona."
The Human Authority Boundary
But here's where it gets interesting: PMs are drawing hard boundaries around interpretation and decision-making. The same Senior Product Manager at Jellyfish was explicit about this division:
"I was deliberate about getting data from the AI tool... I did not ask the AI to draw any conclusions here—I just used it as a substitute for my own time or that of an analyst."
This isn't just about maintaining control—it reflects a sophisticated understanding of AI's limitations. PMs have quickly learned that AI excels at pattern recognition and information synthesis but struggles with context, nuance, and the kind of judgment calls that define product success.
The Emergence of AI Orchestrators
The result is a new professional identity emerging: PMs as AI orchestrators. They're becoming skilled at prompting, directing, and quality-controlling AI output while maintaining human authority over the decisions that matter most. Mira Butler described how AI has become her "sounding board":
"I'll kind of lay out a problem statement and think through different ideas and it helps me consider things I wouldn't have considered before."
It's a delicate balance that requires both technical fluency and the wisdom to know when human judgment is irreplaceable.
The Intuition Wars: When Human Gut Beats Algorithmic Logic
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of our research was exploring what happens when AI recommendations directly conflict with PM intuition. In every single case we documented, experienced PMs chose their gut over the algorithm—and their reasoning reveals why human judgment remains the ultimate authority in product decisions.
The Context That Algorithms Miss
The conflicts aren't rare edge cases—they're happening regularly as PMs push AI to its limits. But what's fascinating is how consistently PMs trust their contextual understanding over algorithmic suggestions, even when the AI appears to have superior data.
Angela Lim at LinkedIn faced exactly this scenario when AI recommended a price decrease to drive premium product growth. The algorithm's logic was sound, but Angela saw the bigger picture:
"I have additional considerations of the impact to our Field sales reps... This may have helped online growth but is not beneficial to the company as a whole."
Her team didn't push back because they understood she was "thinking for the entire company instead of just for our product line."
Domain Expertise Trumps Data
This pattern reveals something profound about the nature of product management: it's fundamentally about navigating competing interests and making decisions with incomplete information. AI can process data and identify patterns, but it can't weigh the political implications of a pricing change or understand the cultural dynamics that might make a technically optimal solution practically impossible.
Alicia Naiman at Highland Capital demonstrated this when AI analysis of the insurance market didn't align with her industry experience. Rather than defer to the algorithm, she explained:
"I tried to come to some sort of analysis between the three to come to a more common sense number."
By leveraging her deep domain knowledge, she was able to correct for AI's blind spots.
The Hallucination Reality Check
A Senior Product Manager at Jellyfish encountered another common limitation:
"I had an AI write me a report on a competitor, and it highlighted a feature we hadn't heard of as a key capability... The capability itself was real, but so minor that it wasn't material to their offering. The AI, however, called it out as a key distinction, which led me to dismiss the rest of the report."
The message from our research is clear: PMs see AI as a powerful tool for analysis, but they view human judgment as the final authority. This isn't stubbornness or resistance to change—it's a sophisticated understanding that product decisions require the kind of contextual wisdom that algorithms can't replicate.
The Empathy Fortress: Building Moats Around Human Connection
Faced with AI's growing analytical capabilities, PMs are rallying around what they believe to be their most defensible asset: the ability to understand and connect with other humans.* But this isn't just about being nice—it's a strategic repositioning around capabilities that appear genuinely difficult for AI to replicate.
Beyond Emotional Intelligence
The most common refrain in our interviews was some variation of "AI can't replace human empathy." But when we dug deeper, we found PMs articulating a sophisticated understanding of why human connection matters in product development. It's not just about emotional intelligence—it's about the ability to read between the lines, understand unstated needs, and navigate the complex social dynamics that determine whether products succeed or fail.
A Senior Product Manager at Jellyfish put it most clearly:
"My PM superpower is user empathy. There's a great deal that unsaid in any human communication, and my success relies in large part on my ability to understand what someone's saying beyond the literal meaning of their words."
The Social Nature of Product Development
This insight points to something deeper than just relationship-building skills. PMs are recognizing that product development is fundamentally a social process—it requires understanding not just what users say they want, but what they actually need, what they're afraid to admit, and what they don't even know they're missing.
Shannon O'Dwyer at Veeva Systems highlighted another dimension of this human advantage: real-time adaptability in conversations.
"I do not think people would want those decisions to come from AI, but they would want to come from a person who's able to present them and answer questions ad hoc in in-person conversations."
The Emergence of "Taste" as Competitive Advantage
But perhaps the most intriguing defense of human irreplaceability centers around what PMs call "taste"—the ineffable ability to judge quality and make aesthetic decisions that separate good products from great ones. A Product Manager at Adobe argued that AI
"will never be able to achieve the ability to develop a sense of quality in the form of taste... I believe that's a uniquely human trait."
This focus on taste represents a fascinating evolution in how PMs see their value. They're moving beyond analytical skills toward something more akin to creative judgment—the ability to sense what feels right, what delights users, and what creates emotional connection with products.
The Relationship Revolution: How AI Changes Team Dynamics
AI isn't just changing what PMs do—it's fundamentally altering how they work with engineering and design teams. Our research reveals both promising developments and concerning trends in these evolving relationships.
The Technical Credibility Boost
On the positive side, AI is enabling PMs to engage more deeply in technical discussions. Beth Gostanian, a VP of Product at a B2B SaaS company, described how AI enhanced her credibility:
"I think it's helped me with credibility with my engineering team because now I can use AI to help me think about technical requirements without having to rely solely on them."
This represents a significant shift in traditional PM-engineering dynamics. Historically, PMs often felt at a disadvantage in technical discussions, dependent on engineers to translate business requirements into technical specifications. AI is leveling this playing field, enabling PMs to engage more substantively in architectural decisions and technical trade-offs.
The Blurring of Role Boundaries
But AI is also blurring traditional role boundaries in ways that create both opportunity and confusion. A Product Manager at Adobe observed that "we're all kind of doing each other's jobs more and more now," with AI enabling PMs to create prototypes, designers to build functional demos, and engineers to conduct their own user research.
This convergence is changing team dynamics in subtle but important ways. A Product Manager at DocuSign noted:
"engineering and design teammates are more comfortable having meetings without me but sending me an AI summary after the fact."
While this might seem like increased efficiency, it also suggests a potential marginalization of the PM role in day-to-day decision-making.
The AI Literacy Divide
The most concerning trend is the emergence of what William Murri at Kroger called "AI literacy divides." Teams are splitting between those who can effectively use AI tools and those who can't, creating new forms of professional inequality.
"It reminds me of when people didn't understand how to use a smartphone," he explained.
These dynamics suggest that AI is not just changing individual roles but reshaping the entire social fabric of product teams. PMs who can navigate these changing relationships while maintaining their unique value will thrive, while those who can't risk being sidelined by more AI-fluent colleagues.
The Anxiety Beneath the Optimism: What PMs Really Fear
While most participants expressed enthusiasm about AI's potential, our research uncovered a deep current of anxiety about job security and professional relevance. This tension between public optimism and private concern may be the most important finding in our study.
The Existential Questions
When we asked PMs about the most uncomfortable questions they could be asked about AI, their responses revealed fears that go far beyond simple job displacement. Melissa Loder at Airship captured the existential nature of these concerns:
"I guess the most uncomfortable question would be 'what value do you even bring anymore?'"
This isn't just about losing tasks to automation—it's about losing professional identity. PMs are grappling with fundamental questions about what makes them valuable when many of their traditional responsibilities can be automated.
The Speed of Change
The anxiety is particularly acute because it's happening so quickly. Miranda Leschke at Microsoft provided the most honest response when asked about her role in 2027:
"I honestly don't know what my job is then. I don't have a response because it's something that totally concerns me."
This vulnerability was striking given Miranda's seniority and Microsoft's advanced AI capabilities.
The Moral Complexity
But perhaps most revealing was the moral dimension of these concerns. Alicia Naiman at Highland Capital raised ethical questions about participating in her own potential obsolescence:
"I think the most uncomfortable question someone could ask me about AI potentially replacing parts of my job would be them asking how I could help replace specific parts of my role... there is a moral dilemma there with replacing people."
This moral complexity adds another layer to the transformation PMs are experiencing. They're not just adapting to new technology—they're wrestling with whether embracing AI makes them complicit in broader workforce displacement.
Adaptation Through Anxiety
The anxiety is real, but it's also driving adaptation. PMs are responding to these fears by doubling down on uniquely human capabilities and positioning themselves as AI orchestrators rather than AI competitors. The question is whether this repositioning will be enough to maintain their professional relevance as AI capabilities continue to advance.
Visions of 2027: The Future PM Identity
When we asked participants to imagine their role in 2027—when AI can analyze user data, generate requirements, prioritize features, and communicate with stakeholders—their responses revealed both adaptation strategies and persistent uncertainty about the future of their profession.
The AI Manager Vision
The most optimistic vision came from William Murri at Kroger, who saw AI as the ultimate junior PM:
"At that point it's really like having a more junior PM that never gets sick or overburdened working for me."
In this future, PMs become managers of AI agents, focusing on oversight and strategic direction while delegating tactical execution to algorithms.
Angela Lim at LinkedIn described a similar coordination role:
"My job would be then to be an agent manager where I delegate parts of my work to the most suitable agent, ask thoughtful questions, and make them into a coherent story."
The Customer-Centric Future
Sofia Martin at Insulet envisioned a more customer-centric future:
"I think I would be able to be a lot more customer focused. The more I could rely on AI tools to take care of a lot of the research, a lot of the documentation, and a lot of the formatting of presentations, the more time I could spend actually in the field talking to customers."
This vision suggests PMs becoming more like anthropologists—spending their time understanding human needs and translating them into product requirements that AI can then execute.
The Uncertainty Factor
But these optimistic visions coexist with genuine uncertainty. The future scenarios PMs described often felt more like hopeful speculation than confident prediction. Many participants seemed to be working through their own thinking in real-time, trying to imagine a role that doesn't yet exist.
What emerges from these future visions is a profession in transition, with PMs positioning themselves as the essential human layer in an AI-augmented product development process. They see themselves as interpreters, relationship builders, and quality curators who ensure that algorithmic efficiency serves human needs.
What This Means for the Industry
Our research reveals implications that extend far beyond individual career adaptation. The transformation of product management offers insights into how entire industries might evolve in the AI era.
For Product Organizations
For product organizations, the message is clear: the traditional PM role is disappearing, but something more valuable is taking its place. Companies that invest in developing their PMs' strategic thinking, relationship management, and AI orchestration capabilities will likely see significant competitive advantages. Those that simply try to replace PMs with AI tools will miss the essential human layer that makes product development successful.
The research also suggests that AI adoption in product management is not just about efficiency—it's about fundamentally reimagining how products get built. The most successful organizations will be those that find the right balance between AI automation and human judgment, leveraging algorithms for analysis while maintaining human authority over the decisions that matter most.
For Individual PMs
For individual PMs, the path forward requires both technical adaptation and philosophical evolution. The tactical skills that once defined PM competency are rapidly becoming commoditized. The future belongs to PMs who can develop deep customer empathy, cross-functional relationship skills, and what our participants called "taste"—the ability to make nuanced quality judgments that algorithms cannot replicate.
For the Broader Knowledge Economy
Perhaps most importantly, our research suggests that the transformation of product management is just the beginning. The patterns we observed—strategic elevation paired with tactical automation, human judgment as the final authority, relationships as competitive moat—likely apply across knowledge work roles. Product management may be the canary in the coal mine for a much broader transformation of professional work in the AI era.
Conclusion
Product management is not disappearing—it's being reborn. AI has forced the profession through an identity crisis that's ultimately leading to elevation rather than elimination. The PMs emerging from this transformation are more strategic, more relationship-focused, and more valuable than their predecessors, but they've also accepted that much of what they once did can now be automated.
The future belongs to PMs who can seamlessly orchestrate AI tools while maintaining their human edge—those who can balance algorithmic efficiency with empathetic understanding, data-driven insights with aesthetic judgment, and automated analysis with contextual wisdom. They're becoming curators of human experience in an increasingly automated world.
Our research reveals that the most successful PMs aren't fighting AI—they're dancing with it. They've learned to delegate the analytical heavy lifting while jealously guarding the interpretive work that defines product success. They're doubling down on taste, empathy, and the kind of nuanced judgment that emerges from deep human understanding.
But this transformation comes with a warning. The PMs who survive this transition will be those who can prove their irreplaceable value at a higher level than ever before. The tactical safety net is gone. The administrative busy work that once filled their days has evaporated. What remains is the pure essence of product management: understanding human needs, making difficult trade-offs, and guiding teams toward solutions that matter.
The anxiety our participants expressed isn't just about job security—it's about professional identity in an age of automation. As one participant put it, the goal is not to compete with AI but to ensure "the AI does not replace me." The PMs who master this balance will find themselves more essential than ever, serving as the crucial human interpreters in an AI-augmented world.
The transformation of product management is ultimately a story of professional evolution under technological pressure. It offers a preview of how knowledge work will adapt in the AI era—not through wholesale replacement, but through strategic repositioning around uniquely human capabilities. The winners will be those who can remain irreplaceably human while leveraging AI's analytical power to amplify their impact.
For questions or to discuss how these insights can inform your organization's AI strategy, reach out to us here.
Want to get involved? Join the Perspective AI Research Community to get notified about future paid research projects.